I was just wondering whether a suggested "structure" for feedback would elicit more responses. Maybe separate threads for specific features that you'd like to see, etc.
My intial thought is that R6 looks much more like a "designed" product than R5 -- with its decidely "glued-on accessory look" -- ever could be. That should mean a much faster learning time.
Responses for bugs are probably not a problem, but being constructive about a bug is quite tricky
I have data for a bug in Save As... image formats.
Also what do you need? I assume you will always want the PSDATA file? The fault can be seen in buffer 19.
Attached ZIP containing: PSDATA, PDF showing Print output, GIF showing screen shot, PNG showing Save As.
Oops it refused that because I used 7z instead of Zip.
Oops2. It will accept ZIP, but it's too big. Actually it's way too big. I'll rename the zip file to a vi file (whatever that is) to slip under the radar.