Pico Current Clamp 60A AC/DC) with BNC and 3m Screened Lead PP264
This question is not specific to Pico's current clamp, but to these types of clamps in general. I am to understand that when testing wide band oxygen sensors that clipping an amps clamp round the cable from the sensor will not be an accurate enough reading for testing purposes, is this true?
Information I have read advises that reading pid data is more accurate, I don't know!!!
I already have amps clamps Fluke but the clamps are large, much larger than the PP264 and also wondered if that would have an effect on the readings!!
As with all things in this game what one person tells you may or may not be correct, as a professional in this industry it is up to each and every one of us to invest time, money and effort to keep up with the ever changing technology that we are required to deal with on a daily basis.
The wideband AFR is a case in point. The technology is not that complex but it is amazing how much complete Bravo Sierra I have seen and heard expounded on the subject.
There are a number of reputable training providers and a lot of resource material available if you look for it and are suitably selective in the material you trust.
As for amp clamps the TA018 is a well-respected and perfectly capable piece of equipment with physical advantages for tight access. The TA234 has a larger jaw profile which has advantages in some situations as well as a very good performance profile.
You can of course make a simple inductive current magnifying loop (10X) is usually enough and the TA234 then stretches it’s legs even further into the low amp range.
As far as I am aware the PP264 you are referring to is long obsolete (Please provide the link you found it on as I am intrigued!)
As with all thing it is a case of “horses for courses” and everyone does things differently!
As for live data the pids can often be limited or simply not there, (even in esi on Bosch systems!) Also you have to factor in the limitations of refresh rate on your scan tool. Most of which are stone age in terms of performance. A Picoscope will always run rings around them! Plus you have to remember that you are only looking at “Back Door Data”.
Kev.
The Pico TA018 current clamp can either be purchased as an accessory within one of our popular diagnostic kits or individually under the packing code PP264.
The Pico TA018 current clamp can either be purchased as an accessory within one of our popular diagnostic kits or individually under the packing code PP264.
I am duly educated thanks Martyn. I did not realise that you were using two part numbers for the same component. I only know it as the TA018.
I have the AEMC K110 as well, and looking at the pictures and spec of the Chauvin Arnoux K2 would say that it is just a rebadged version of the K110. Even the adjustment screw for Zero is identical !!
In terms of responsiveness, the Steve Smith article mentioned before https://www.picoauto.com/library/traini ... gen-sensor, while seemingly a little fiddly to setup (as is the K110/K2 BTW), will give superiour results if you measure things correctly, with no risk of clamp wander, flat batteries ... plus it's not needing a £500+ bit of kit. Response frequency on any clamp will fall below that of the scopes native voltage sampling, so you have to be careful about sample rates.
While the jaws are pretty small, you may need to use a breakout lead for some sensors due to their and the harness outer sheath (assuming you're not going to start cutting into it) while back pinning is almost 100% accessible, and some of these new connectors would be a manual breakout lead, all adding to the melé ... and if you are road testing then you have an darn expensive bit of kit in a hot and high vibration environment ... just some stuff to consider!
Don't get me wrong, the K110/K2 has it's place, especially if measuring 4-20ma sensors, but even with one in my arsenal I'd look to find alternative methods to achieve the goal before rolling it out!
Just my 2p
Best, Richard
Last edited by FioranoCars on Sat Aug 05, 2017 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Steve smiths case study works a treat. An easier, quicker & less detailed method is to ac couple the signal wire and you can see rich or lean which is enough most of the time.
If you really need to know how rich or how lean then you can graph the data on a good scan tool and that will paint a reasonable picture, of course that is slow serial data not as raw or as accurate as the Pico will show
As with all things in this game what one person tells you may or may not be correct, as a professional in this industry it is up to each and every one of us to invest time, money and effort to keep up with the ever changing technology that we are required to deal with on a daily basis.
The wideband AFR is a case in point. The technology is not that complex but it is amazing how much complete Bravo Sierra I have seen and heard expounded on the subject.
There are a number of reputable training providers and a lot of resource material available if you look for it and are suitably selective in the material you trust.
As for amp clamps the TA018 is a well-respected and perfectly capable piece of equipment with physical advantages for tight access. The TA234 has a larger jaw profile which has advantages in some situations as well as a very good performance profile.
You can of course make a simple inductive current magnifying loop (10X) is usually enough and the TA234 then stretches it’s legs even further into the low amp range.
As far as I am aware the PP264 you are referring to is long obsolete (Please provide the link you found it on as I am intrigued!)
As with all thing it is a case of “horses for courses” and everyone does things differently!
As for live data the pids can often be limited or simply not there, (even in esi on Bosch systems!) Also you have to factor in the limitations of refresh rate on your scan tool. Most of which are stone age in terms of performance. A Picoscope will always run rings around them! Plus you have to remember that you are only looking at “Back Door Data”.
Kev.
Thanks Kev, I'm going to have a look into the chauvin-arnoux.com website and have a good read up.