Vehicle details: Vauxhall Corsa
Year: 2004
Symptom: MIL on,
Non-starter with cranking,
P1615,
P1616
Author: Nick Hibberd | Hibtech Auto-Electrical Diagnostics

Vauxhall Corsa | Non-starter

Symptoms

This 2004 Corsa 1.2 arrived with dash and engine auxiliaries already stripped and its trims and covers in the boot. In fact the ECM was missing and had to be sourced from the previous repairer; so a good start. The car had an original complaint of a sudden no-start condition after seemingly faultless running, the previous diagnosis had condemned the engine ECU and I was called for an independent opinion.

On arrival I found the engine would crank with good speed but wouldn’t fire. From previous dealings with this model I know the engine MIL and oil MIL are controlled by the ECM, and here I had the engine MIL flagged but no oil MIL: a possible early clue. Checking the system with the scan tool found P1615 WRONG VEHICLE ID FROM BODY CONTROLLER and P1616 WRONG VEHICLE ID FROM INSTRUMENT, with both faults logged as present and unable to clear. At this early stage there was no suggestion that I was dealing with the usual suspects: CKP, CMP, fuel delivery, or any base calculation sensor. This problem was leaning towards a CAN issue or an exchange of data between control units.

Investigating the electrical system

It’s helpful to gain some knowledge of the electrical architecture of the vehicle under test: where control units are located, their master/slave relationship, and the number of networks will prove a worthwhile research.

Here is the basic layout I found for the main control units.

Already a bigger picture is emerging about the problem and the likely area to start looking. The ECM is reporting a problem with both INS and BC, yet data exchange between INS and BC themselves appears OK (no DTCs) making the ECM a common denominator. Both INS and BC appear to be functioning fine with all their associated auxiliaries working, so a power supply issue is unlikely. Also I have good communication between the scan tool and ECM, allowing different self-activations and accurate live parameter readings, so again a power supply issue at the ECM is unlikely. The next step is to verify the data transmission line: the CAN bus.

Checking with the PicoScope

There’s no better place to take measurements than directly at the control unit. Why? You are seeing what the control unit sees. Fig.1 shows a typical recording taken from the two CAN cables at the ECM.

This is far from the pair of mirror-image signals we would normally expect to see. CAN H represents a good signal structure with well-defined dominant and recessive bits, but CAN L displays no recognisable bit transmission and its line stability has drifted low.

TIP: Expect some networks to revert to single-wire CAN if such a problem exists. However, this ECM remained off-line throughout.

CAN relies on differential transmission, where a recognisable message is achieved by the difference in voltage between the two lines. Ordinarily in this case a recessive bit would result in 0 V  between two cables and a dominant bit would result in 2 V. With our problem car the erroneous CAN L will affect the overall data packet received.

This is good confirmation that a CAN fault exists, so now we must try to isolate the problem. Each node was checked to monitor general line activity and make some comparisons. I found good CAN signal structure at the ABS and BCM, leaving only the ECM affected by the fault. This has localised the problem to engine bay area and focuses on the wiring between the ECM and its harness splice onto the CAN line.

Fig.2 was recorded during a wiggle test on the engine harness and shows a direct effect on signal structure when the harness is flexed. At one point I managed to get the CAN lines close to normal, at which point the ECM eventually allowed a successful start for first time in a long while. Stripping the harness eventually revealed the fault.

A small section of the CAN cabling had suffered from corrosion badly and had eaten away nearly all of the cable strands. It is likely a result of chafing on the inside of its protective conduit which is supposed to protect the harness from such failure – ironically. Because the test points were intentionally placed at the rear of the control unit, positive confirmation of a problem was easy. Generally, taking CAN measurements at mid-harness connections or perhaps at a CARB socket is a valid circuit performance check; but just be aware that a spliced take-off with an open circuit will be near-invisible when you check the main line and its termination resistors.

 

Lessons learned

Thinking back to the beginning, having the engine MIL flagged but no oil MIL is a peculiar system response to this CAN line fault but one worth remembering. Operational characteristics aren’t something read in a manual, but are learnt through hands-on experience. Hope it helps.

Comments

28 comments | Add comment

Andrew Farmer
July 31 2016

Great article. Just had exactly the same fault and nailed it thanks to this. White CAN wire rubbed through where the protective tubing meets the hard plastic harness support. Soldered, heatshrunk, replicated the twists. Sorted!

Neil Corfield - Master Technician Trainer
January 07 2016

Great article here;

Clear indication of the CAN H & L Signals, can often prove without doubt the signal condition from each control unit.

In this case shown highlighted a broken wire.
I have also had identical fault codes in relation to water ingress within the ABS Control Unit and subsequently poor connection of the transmission lines to ECM, Body and Instrument Controls Modules.

I currently set this a diagnostic fault for students.

Claude
May 02 2015

Many thanks for your article on this problem. Had same issue with one car and after reading your article I found the cambus wire broken. After the repair the car started straight away.

chris
February 24 2015

hi i have an issue with my corsa c.my washer pump wont work and have replaced and replaced ignition switch,along with indicator arm.had Auto electrics out ,checked falts no falt shown,tested wires to washer pump and fuses althogh i told him had done.he said it may be the BODY CONTROL MODULE,BUT DIDUNT SHOW AS FALT ON DIEGNOSTICS ,FALT STILL PRESANT AND PAID AUTO ELECTRIC £60 POUND AND HE WAS PATHETIC ,DIDUNT FIX DAM WRONG.CAN ANY BODY HELP PLEASE OR SHOW ME HOW TO TEST PLEASE

Bogdan
October 10 2014

Great write up !
There is so much to be learned from this Cases !
I guess you are the last desperate solution where all other shops just fail !

Arvind
September 04 2014

I have code U0d00 and U1100 to do with Can bus comma error. Can someone please give information on location where this wire damage is?

Anonymous
September 03 2014

Help I have Corsa C 1.2l 2002 auto had U0D00, U1100. Can communication error codes. Where about people have the damaged wires? Please help.
Regards
Arvind

stuart
March 20 2014

same as above I am also looking for this broken wire, anyone have any idea?

Rob
February 01 2014

I have exactly the same fault with a corsa where was this wire found broken

Anonymous
November 25 2013

great way to explain how easy a diagnosys can be with a logical aproach and understanding of the system you are working on, thank you very much.

Jay
November 21 2013

Had the same fault code along with a worn through can bus wire, repaired wire now all good.

Gordon
February 28 2012

Where exactly was this wire broken? I have this exact same fault on my own Corsa C. Run fine Thursday night, Monday morning, runs for 2 seconds each time then dies.

Codes are wrong ID from BCM, wrong ID from Instrument Control Unit and occasional no communication with ABS.

bill
December 13 2011

brilliant diagnostic by logic and experiance.
a example of how it should be done

Mark
May 30 2011

Nice diag. Looks like CAN C, a little curious of which had the terminating resistors.

first transit/ MTS

mursal
March 27 2011

Thanks guys, very interesting

Fahim
December 04 2010

Thanks for the great write up! You sure know your stuff. Amazing! grin

John Mazarakis Holden TAC
December 01 2009

Nice diagnosis….Excellent description.

KCA01
November 04 2009

Thanks so much for taking the time to share, great layout and explanation, very helpful - lesson learned smile

KT CHUNG
June 17 2009

In this case I had understand test CAN bus skill.
Thank you very much

claude
June 11 2009

What i do not understand is how the scanner can communicates with the ecu if there is a CAN issue.the diagnostic plug is not integrated in the ecu, but in the harness i think.

Dave Smith
June 01 2009

I’m glad people have the time to document repairs like this as it is so helpful and reasuring that these problem can (no pun intended) be solved with the right knowledge and a logical approach.

A. Bothwell
May 30 2009

This kind of stuff really seperates the men from the boys in Auto Electrical, excellent example of quality testing to achieve the right diagnosis.

d jones
May 30 2009

Another good example of “to fix it you must be able to see it”. Thanks for the insight.

paul robbie
May 30 2009

Great reading,my only question is was there any evidence why this corrosion started? Was there any evidence of a previous repair or water ingress into the harness?

R.Westenskow
May 30 2009

Thank you Nick for another fine diagnostic example.
In your above waveforms are you probing with “low-pass filters”??
when you probe CAN signals?

Jerry
May 29 2009

I think it is good diagnostics I just took a class on can communications and I was impressed with Pico.

Peter M Gant
May 29 2009

It’s an interesting tale of an alternative technology (I work on RF devices). What would help the story would be an explanation of the various initials, some of us don’t know our ECM from our ECU.

PMG

Nick Tillyer
May 29 2009

Again, another very useful and informative real world scenario great for professionals and students alike. Thanks for taking the time to share.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Case study: Non-starter